UBERMORGEN.COM (Lizvlx/Hans Bernhard)
Interview : 10 questions
Since a reasonable time, digital media entered the field of art and extended the traditional definition of art through some new , but very essential components.
Do you think it is like that and if yes, tell me more about these components and how they changed the perception of art?
No, i dont think that happend
A relevant section of digital art represents Internet based art. The Internet was hardly existing, but artists conquered already this new field for their artistic activities.
Can the work of these early artists be compared with those who work with advanced technologies nowadays? What changed until these days ? What might be the perspectives for future developments?
In the early days of the Internet / Net.Art we were primarily dealing with
the “limitations” of technology. This has changed.
The education in the field of New Media art, including Internet based art, started late compared with the general speed of technological development and acceptance.
So, generations of artists who used the Internet as their artistic working field were not educated in this new discipline(s) and technologies, but had rather an interdisciplinary approach.
What Do you think, would be the best way to teach young people how to deal with the Internet as an environment of art?
Give them a labtop and an internet connection when they turn 6 years old.
What kind of meaning have the new technologies and the Internet to you in concern of art, are they just tools for expressing artistic intentions, or have they rather an ideological character, as it can be found with many “netartists”, or what else do they mean to you?
Many “Internet based artists” work on “engaged” themes and subjects, for instance, in social, political, cultural etc concern.
Which contents are you particularly interested in, personally and from an artcritical point of view.
We are doing pure research, basic freestyle research.
The term “netart” is widely used for anything posted on the net, there are dozens of definitions which mostly are even contradictory.
How do you define “netart” or if you like the description “Internet based art” better?
Do you think “netart” is art, at all, if yes, what are the criteria?
Are there any aesthetic criteria for an Internet based artwork?
First: I dont know
Second: Yes, but i dont know about the criteria
“Art on the net” has the advantage and the disadvantage to be located on the virtual space in Internet which defines also its right to exist.
Do you think, that “art based on the Internet”, can be called still like that, even if it is just used offline?
Dealing with this new, and interactive type of art demands an active viewer or user, and needs the audience much more and in different ways than any other art discipline before. How do you think would be good ways to stimulate the user to dive into this new world of art?
There is no stimulation necessary, good work will work by itself
What do you think represents an appropriate environment to present net based art to an audience, is it the context of the lonesome user sitting in front of his personal computer, is it any public context, or is it rather the context of art in general or media art in particular, or anything else.?
mass media is a good transporter, and yes for sure, the “lone” user sitting
in front of the computer.. the public context is mass media or then museums
or the art market
If you would be in the position to create an environment for presenting this type of art in physical space, how would you do it?
we are in this position. we do it in different ways by using diagrams,
overhead projectors, digital or analogue slideshows, sculptures,
paintings or photos, Seals (pseudo gov. “logos”), etc.. http://www.ubermorgen.com
As Internet based art, as well as other art forms using new technologies are (globally seen) still not widely accepted, yet, as serious art forms, what do you think could be an appropriate solution to change this situation?
The market has to crash before it will fully absorb digital art, but still
there are galleries working into the market and there are exhibitions
in museums and galleries, but they are still irrelevant if you look at
the whole picture..
The Internet is sometimes called a kind of “democratic” environment,
The conventional art practice is anything else than that, but selective by using filters of different kind.
The audience is mostly only able to make up its mind on second hand. Art on the net might potentially be different. Do you think the current practice of dealing with Internet based art is such different or rather the described conventional way through (also curatorial) filtering?
conventional way for the conventional art market, but that does not
mean that there will be no new concepts of commercialization of
net.art/digital art in the future, but dont ask me how they will look like,,
Do you think, that speaking in the terms of Joseph Beuys, anybody who publishes anything on the net would be also an artist?
Do you think, the curators dealing with net based art should have any technological knowledge in order to understand such an art work from its roots?
And what about the users of Internet based art?